FAQ  •  Register  •  Login

suggestion: trading changes

<<

Baka

Asgard Supporter

Posts: 221

Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:36 am

Post Sat Apr 10, 2010 5:19 am

suggestion: trading changes

i suggest to put the limit and restriction to trading. as it is now, instead of trading, people are using them for secondary storage of 99999BCs and it's infuriating for those who wanted to do actual trading.

Suggestions:
1. restrict trading of the same resources. i.e. bc to bc.
2a. option 1: restrict multiple high bc posting. i.e. not more than 2 or 3 99999bc posting.
2b. option 2: put a counter on maximum resources than can be posted at one time. ie. max posted trade amount is 99999.

side suggestion:
people are having too much bc nowadays, so i suggest making a trade of BC to Crystals, which I am sure would sell like a hot cake. 99999BC per crystal. in that way, people would not have an overflow of BC with nowhere to store them (or be paranoid that someone would steal them), and have some extra crystals that may have more use than overflowing bc.

side side suggestion:
update Prime server to the newest things. images, codes, and whatnots.

edit: oops. i just realized this is harbinger slot. i was meaning to post this in prime.
edit2: nvm. apparently, there's no suggestion box for prime anymore.
<<

Pr3t3nd3r

User avatar

Programmer, Designer

Posts: 280

Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:46 am

Post Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:59 pm

Re: suggestion: trading changes

I was thinking of taking some measure to stop this problems. Nice idea of BC to Crystals.

Now:
- You can no longer trade for same resource type.
- Fixed bug which did not allowed to accept a Huge BC trade.
- Max resource profit is 3x.
- Added BC to crystal option.
<<

shanwilder

Lvl. 7: Ascended

Posts: 112

Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:17 pm

Post Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:46 pm

Re: suggestion: trading changes

Just out of interest in the game, the changes have cleaned up the BC issue somewhat but now there are about 7 pages of 1/3 the BC for 1 Resource. 33333BC for 99999 energy for example. The issue is still clearly a problem. An idea, and thats all it is, nothing more is that maybe you cannot put up on the market anymore resources than you can trade.

So for example if your transporter is level 15 then you carry 1900 per transport or a maximum of 15x1900=28500 worth of resources. So basically what im saying in that you should only be allowed to search for a maximum of 28500 resources, you can only offer up to that much so why should you be allowed to recieve more than that. This means that people can put there BC on the market for legitimate trading and not for hiding?

Thoughts, further suggestions?
<<

Lost Orions

Lvl. 3: Pip-Boy

Posts: 24

Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 7:32 pm

Post Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:39 pm

Re: suggestion: trading changes

Yes good try at a solution, but it just made matters worse. Can we go back to allowing 99999 bc's for 99999bc's till we find a better solution.
Or you could just make bc's like every other resource. Then no one would use the trade boards for storage.
Or you could come up with another type of building to store bc's in. like a subspace vault or something. Make it expensive like shifters. You could even make a certain level shifter as a requirement Like level 15 or 20. Make it one of the first buildings to get downgraded by a Valhalla or Disturbia. You could include crystals in the price of the new building. :idea:
<<

ezeratul

Lvl. 5: Trainee

Posts: 43

Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:00 pm

Post Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: suggestion: trading changes

Pr3t3nd3r wrote:I was thinking of taking some measure to stop this problems. Nice idea of BC to Crystals.

Now:
- You can no longer trade for same resource type.
- Fixed bug which did not allowed to accept a Huge BC trade.
- Max resource profit is 3x.
- Added BC to crystal option.




I still can put 9999 bc for 9999 of some other resources on the market and thus use market as a storage. I though that was not possible anymore??

Return to Suggestions? Requests?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron